|
| 0 Out of 10 |  | by Tech Radar (Jan, 2011) by Tech Radar (Jan, 2011) |
| | ||
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the AMD Athlon II X3 450 among laptop CPUs (over 15W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 0 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the AMD Athlon II X3 450
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Reviews Word on the street for the AMD Athlon II X3 450
 |
| |
|---|---|---|
What People Are Saying Give it to me straight
Socket Type
by Tech Radar (Jan, 2011)With the fourth core unlocked and the chip clocked up to 3.6GHz, this processor is ludicrously quick for a sub-£60 CPU.
Multicore
by Tech Radar (Jan, 2011)But perhaps its most intriguing feature is a hidden fourth core.
Price
by Tech Radar (Jan, 2011)But then it does cost less than one third the price.
Performance
by Tech Radar (Jan, 2011)The harsh truth about the AMD Athlon II X3 450 is that it only exists because AMD is currently struggling to compete with Intel for raw processor performance.
Type of CPU
by Tech Radar (Jan, 2011)In the meantime, AMD is forced to scrounge for scraps at the budget end of the market.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
| Clock speed | 3.2 GHz |
|---|---|
| Cores | Tri core |
| Socket type |
|
| Is unlocked | No |
features
| Has a NX bit | Yes |
|---|---|
| Has virtualization support | Yes |
| Instruction set extensions |
|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
power consumption
| TDP | 95W |
|---|---|
| Annual home energy cost | 39.59 $/year |
| Performance per watt | 1.07 pt/W |
| Idle power consumption | 64.3W |
| Peak power consumption | 129.5W |
| Typical power consumption | 113.2W |
bus
| Clock speed | 100 MHz |
|---|
details
| Architecture | x86-64 |
|---|---|
| Threads | 3 threads |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core |
| L3 cache | 0.5 MB |
| L3 cache per core | 0.17 MB/core |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm |
| Max CPUs | 1 |
| Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.4V |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 75°C |
overclocking
| Overclock popularity | 16 |
|---|---|
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.86 GHz |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.86 GHz |
integrated graphics
| GPU | None |
|---|
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
| | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
