AMD Athlon 5350 

Released December, 2013
  • 2.05 GHz
  • Quad core
6.2 Out of 10

Pentium J2900Celeron J1900Celeron J1800CPU Cores442Base/Turbo Boost Clock Rate2.41/2.67 GHz2/2.42 GHz2.41/2.58 GHzDynamic GPU Clock Range688/896 MHz688/854 MHz688/792 MHzMemory Data Rate1333 MT/s1333 MT/s1333 MT/sTotal Cache2 MB2 MB1 MBTDP10 W10 W10 W At least in this segment, AMD and Intel are topping out with four cores (the Jaguar architecture can continue scaling, as it does in the Xbox and PlayStation, while Silvermont does as well in the Atom C2000 family).
by Don-Woligroski (Apr, 2014)
Historically AMD has done a good job of maintaining backwards compatibility with sockets for as long as possible, the one challenge being shifts in memory technology.
by Ian-Cutress (Apr, 2014)

CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the AMD Athlon 5350

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Athlon 5350
5.9
Cinebench R10 32-bit and Passmark

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Athlon 5350
6.5
Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and Passmark (Single Core)

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

Athlon 5350
6.1
Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Athlon 5350
N/A
Performance Per Dollar

6.2

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

Athlon 5350
6.2

Benchmarks Real world tests of the AMD Athlon 5350

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

Athlon 5350
6,976
Pentium G3420
11,869
Sempron 3850
4,593
AMD Athlon 5350 vs. Intel Celeron G465 Single Threaded Athlon 5350 Celeron G465 Cinebench R10 1967 2975 Cinebench R11.5 0.51 0.73 Dolphin Benchmark 40.4 38.8 3DPM 53.29 59.98 Does it seem particularly odd that a modern Kabini architecture at 2 GHz cannot keep up with a 3 year old Sandy Bridge processor at 1.9 GHz at our simple benchmarks?
by Ian-Cutress (Apr, 2014)

Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)

Athlon 5350
2,040
Sempron 3850
1,303
AMD Athlon 5350 vs. Intel Celeron J1800 Single Threaded Athlon 5350 Celeron J1800 Cinebench R10 1967 1917 Cinebench R11.5 0.51 0.49 Dolphin Benchmark 40.4 38.02 3DPM 53.29 69.20 When placing Kabini against any Intel Ivy Bridge socketed processor, the increased IPC and frequency pushes the system above the Kabini, in exchange for more power and a more expensive system overall.
by Ian-Cutress (Apr, 2014)

Passmark

Athlon 5350
2,607
If we compare the Kabini single-threaded results to those of the Celeron G465, a Sandy Bridge based single core CPU at 1.9 GHz, the Celeron does pull ahead on the majority, but fails miserably in the graphical benchmark suite.
by Ian-Cutress (Apr, 2014)

Passmark (Single Core)

Athlon 5350
804

In The News From around the web

9
Apr

The Desktop Kabini Review Part 1: AMD Athlon 5350 (AM1) Tested

by Ian Cutress |
www.anandtech.com
Although the rest of AMD's desktop sockets still rely on a latch + lever retention system, Socket-FS1b moves to a push-pin design similar to what Intel uses on its motherboards (albeit with fewer mounting holes, and much simpler mounting/removing due to lower retention force requirements).
Now either the motherboard manufacturer is getting a good deal on the CPU below tray price (most likely), or Intel is subsiding the cost, or the tray price is incorrect.
Add into that equation the inefficiency of a 500 watt power supply pushing 23 watts… we can see that the potential for a system with a much smaller and efficient power supply could potentially get down to the 12 watt range.
AM1 will likely not overclock worth beans, but the combination of efficiency and a deep feature set will make this product appealing to a significant cross section of consumers.
9
Apr

AMD Athlon 5350 And AM1 Platform Review: Kabini In A Socket

by Don Woligroski |
www.tomshardware.com
Indeed, most of the Bay Trail-equipped boards we've seen so far appear best suited to industrial applications.
Pentium J2900Celeron J1900Celeron J1800CPU Cores442Base/Turbo Boost Clock Rate2.41/2.67 GHz2/2.42 GHz2.41/2.58 GHzDynamic GPU Clock Range688/896 MHz688/854 MHz688/792 MHzMemory Data Rate1333 MT/s1333 MT/s1333 MT/sTotal Cache2 MB2 MB1 MBTDP10 W10 W10 W At least in this segment, AMD and Intel are topping out with four cores (the Jaguar architecture can continue scaling, as it does in the Xbox and PlayStation, while Silvermont does as well in the Atom C2000 family).
It is estimated that the entry level Kabini APU and motherboard combo will cost just around $60 US.
The chips both have a TDP of 25W which is quite good for desktop consumers aiming to build media boxes and HTPCs with these processors.

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Clock speed 2.05 GHz
Cores Quad core
Socket type FS1b
Is unlocked No
Is hyperthreaded No

features

Has a NX bit No
Supports trusted computing No
Has vitualization support Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
  1. MMX
  2. SSE4.2
  3. Supplemental SSE3
  4. SSE4.1
  5. SSE
  6. SSE4
  7. F16C
  8. SSE4a
  9. SSE3
  10. SSE Family
  11. SSE2
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes

gpu

GPU GPU
Label Radeon HD 8400
GPU clock speed 128 MHz
Turbo clock speed 600 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in
Memory type
  1. DDR3-1600
  2. DDR3L-1600
Channels Single Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s

details

Architecture x86-64
Threads 4 threads
L2 cache 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nms
Max CPUs 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 70°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.49 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.05 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.49 GHz

power consumption

TDP 25W
Annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year
Performance per watt 13.43 pt/W
Typical power consumption 20.31W
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
Also the GPU model is incorrect...
The GPU's clock speed is 600 MHz, not 128 MHz. 128 is the amount of shaders.
comments powered by Disqus