|
| 6.2 Out of 10 |  | by Don-Woligroski (Apr, 2014) by Ian-Cutress (Apr, 2014) |
| | ||
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the AMD Athlon 5350
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Cinebench R10 32-bit and Passmark | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and Passmark (Single Core) | |
Overclocking | |
How much speed can you get out of the processor? | |
| Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
| 6.2 | CPUBoss Score |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the AMD Athlon 5350
Cinebench R10 32-Bit
by Ian-Cutress (Apr, 2014)AMD Athlon 5350 vs. Intel Celeron G465 Single Threaded Athlon 5350 Celeron G465 Cinebench R10 1967 2975 Cinebench R11.5 0.51 0.73 Dolphin Benchmark 40.4 38.8 3DPM 53.29 59.98 Does it seem particularly odd that a modern Kabini architecture at 2 GHz cannot keep up with a 3 year old Sandy Bridge processor at 1.9 GHz at our simple benchmarks?
Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)
by Ian-Cutress (Apr, 2014)AMD Athlon 5350 vs. Intel Celeron J1800 Single Threaded Athlon 5350 Celeron J1800 Cinebench R10 1967 1917 Cinebench R11.5 0.51 0.49 Dolphin Benchmark 40.4 38.02 3DPM 53.29 69.20 When placing Kabini against any Intel Ivy Bridge socketed processor, the increased IPC and frequency pushes the system above the Kabini, in exchange for more power and a more expensive system overall.
Passmark
by Ian-Cutress (Apr, 2014)If we compare the Kabini single-threaded results to those of the Celeron G465, a Sandy Bridge based single core CPU at 1.9 GHz, the Celeron does pull ahead on the majority, but fails miserably in the graphical benchmark suite.
Passmark (Single Core)
In The News From around the web
| 9 Apr |
|
Although the rest of AMD's desktop sockets still rely on a latch + lever retention system, Socket-FS1b moves to a push-pin design similar to what Intel uses on its motherboards (albeit with fewer mounting holes, and much simpler mounting/removing due to lower retention force requirements).
Now either the motherboard manufacturer is getting a good deal on the CPU below tray price (most likely), or Intel is subsiding the cost, or the tray price is incorrect.
| 9 Apr |
|
Add into that equation the inefficiency of a 500 watt power supply pushing 23 watts… we can see that the potential for a system with a much smaller and efficient power supply could potentially get down to the 12 watt range.
AM1 will likely not overclock worth beans, but the combination of efficiency and a deep feature set will make this product appealing to a significant cross section of consumers.
| 9 Apr |
|
Indeed, most of the Bay Trail-equipped boards we've seen so far appear best suited to industrial applications.
Pentium J2900Celeron J1900Celeron J1800CPU Cores442Base/Turbo Boost Clock Rate2.41/2.67 GHz2/2.42 GHz2.41/2.58 GHzDynamic GPU Clock Range688/896 MHz688/854 MHz688/792 MHzMemory Data Rate1333 MT/s1333 MT/s1333 MT/sTotal Cache2 MB2 MB1 MBTDP10 W10 W10 W At least in this segment, AMD and Intel are topping out with four cores (the Jaguar architecture can continue scaling, as it does in the Xbox and PlayStation, while Silvermont does as well in the Atom C2000 family).
| 25 Mar |
|
It is estimated that the entry level Kabini APU and motherboard combo will cost just around $60 US.
The chips both have a TDP of 25W which is quite good for desktop consumers aiming to build media boxes and HTPCs with these processors.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
| Clock speed | 2.05 GHz |
|---|---|
| Cores | Quad core |
| Socket type | FS1b |
| Is unlocked | No |
| Is hyperthreaded | No |
features
| Has a NX bit | No |
|---|---|
| Supports trusted computing | No |
| Has vitualization support | Yes |
| Instruction-set-extensions |
|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
gpu
| GPU | GPU |
|---|---|
| Label | Radeon HD 8400 |
| GPU clock speed | 128 MHz |
| Turbo clock speed | 600 MHz |
memory controller
| Memory controller | Built-in |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
|
| Channels | Single Channel |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s |
details
| Architecture | x86-64 |
|---|---|
| Threads | 4 threads |
| L2 cache | 2 MB |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core |
| Manufacture process | 28 nms |
| Max CPUs | 1 |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 70°C |
overclocking
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.49 GHz |
|---|---|
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.05 GHz |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.49 GHz |
power consumption
| TDP | 25W |
|---|---|
| Annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 21.9 $/year |
| Performance per watt | 13.57 pt/W |
| Typical power consumption | 20.31W |
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Competitors
 | |
 | |
 | AMD Sempron 3850
|
 | |
 | |
 | AMD Athlon 5150
|
 | |
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $334 | $313 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $340 | $313 | |
| Intel 4790K vs Core i7 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $195 | $313 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790 vs 4770K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $378 | ||
| Intel Core i7 4700MQ vs AMD A10 5750M | ||
 | VS |  |
| $235 | $180 | |
| Intel Core i5 4670K vs AMD FX 8350 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $393 | $281 | |
| Intel Core i7 4500U vs i5 4200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $281 | |
| Intel Core i5 4200M vs 4200U | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 2 comments.
