AMD A6 1450 

Released May, 2013
  • 1 GHz
  • Quad core
6.4 Out of 10

You need to be below 5W TDP in order to have a fanless system, and Temash based tablets branded as A6 and A4 systems are fanless at the reference clock.
by Fuad-Abazovic (Mar, 2013)
It seems like Temash has a chance to do well as long as AMD manages to lock enough design wins for late Q2 2013 introduction.
by Fuad-Abazovic (Mar, 2013)

CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the AMD A6 1450 among laptop CPUs (up to 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores
A6 1450
5.8
Celeron N3050
5.2
Core i5 4200U
8.0
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance
A6 1450
5.3
Celeron N3050
5.1
Core i5 4200U
8.6
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics
A6 1450
n.d.
Celeron N3050
n.d.
Core i5 4200U
8.7
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
A6 1450
6.6
Celeron N3050
6.4
Core i5 4200U
8.4
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
A6 1450
5.7
Celeron N3050
6.1
Core i5 4200U
5.3
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?
A6 1450
6.8
Celeron N3050
n.d.
Core i5 4200U
5.3
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more
6.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets
A6 1450
6.4
Celeron N3050
6.0
Core i5 4200U
8.2

Benchmarks Real world tests of the AMD A6 1450

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

A6 1450
15.51 mHash/s
Celeron N3050
6.77 mHash/s
Core i5 4200U
11.53 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

A6 1450
2.53 mPixels/s
Core i5 4200U
10.62 mPixels/s
Celeron N3050
4.48 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

A6 1450
0.31 fps
Core i5 4200U
1.18 fps
Celeron N3050
0.44 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A6 1450
1,892
Core i5 4200U
4,464
Celeron N3050
1,584

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A6 1450
694
Core i5 4200U
2,312
Celeron N3050
879

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A6 1450
639,700 MB/s
Core i5 4200U
3,015,000 MB/s
Celeron N3050
350.4 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

A6 1450
1,526
Core i5 4200U
3,273
Celeron N3050
885

PassMark (Single Core)

A6 1450
503
Core i5 4200U
1,380
Celeron N3050
467

In The News From around the web

11
Mar

AMD A6-1450 quad-core 1.0GHz APU is Temash

by Fuad Abazovic |
www.fudzilla.com
Luckily, we received further details that can back up some earlier performance claims and reveal some additional details.
The numbers are coming from AMD’s official presentation that was shown at Mobile World Congress.

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Clock speed 1 GHz
Turbo clock speed 1.4 GHz
Cores Quad core
Is unlocked No

features

Has a NX bit Yes
Has virtualization support Yes
Instruction set extensions
  1. AES
  2. AMD-V
  3. AMD64
  4. AVX
  5. BMI1
  6. F16C
  7. MMX
  8. SSE
  9. SSE2
  10. SSE3
  11. SSE4.1
  12. SSE4.2
  13. SSE4a
  14. Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes

power consumption

TDP 8W
Annual home energy cost 1.93 $/year
Performance per watt 24.72 pt/W
Typical power consumption 6.5W

details

Threads 4 threads
L2 cache 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm
Max CPUs 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.06 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.06 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU
Label Radeon™ HD 8250
Latest DirectX 11.0
GPU clock speed 300 MHz
Turbo clock speed 400 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in
Memory type DDR3L-1066
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 3 comments.
Guest (07:46 PM, November 26, 2013)
Really want to know that too. Its seems weird to me. Cos the tdp is lower. But intel got good battery time.
John Scott (10:06 AM, October 1, 2013)
The A6 1450 is in the Acer V5 I bought. Its better then a A4 chipset that was in a similar V5 from Acer. Response is good as long as you don't expect too much from a 1.0 ghz CPU. I doubt gaming will be very good with such a slow CPU side of it. GPU wise I think it suffers because of the slow CPU side. HD video plays OK and I find that the basic web surfing, document work, and basic office task are fine with this kind of chipset. Again though I am amazed that better battery life cannot be had from such a low powered APU?
shivam.G (12:58 PM, August 27, 2013)
so this A6 seem to b SOC based chip for ultra low power consumption am i right n still not beating intel processors.
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss