AMD A10 5757M 

Announced June, 2013
  • 2.5 GHz
  • Quad core
6.3 Out of 10

CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the AMD A10 5757M

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

A10 5757M
6.2
3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark and GeekBench

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

A10 5757M
7.2
Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

A10 5757M
5.3
TDP

Value

A10 5757M
N/A
Performance Per Dollar

6.3

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Value

A10 5757M
6.3

Benchmarks Real world tests of the AMD A10 5757M

GeekBench (32-bit)

A10 5757M
3,741

GeekBench

A10 5757M
3,741

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

A10 5757M
2,986

Passmark

A10 5757M
3,138

Passmark (Single Core)

A10 5757M
1,090

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Clock speed 2.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz
Cores Quad core
Is unlocked No
Is hyperthreaded No

gpu

GPU GPU
Label Radeon™ HD 8650G
Latest DirectX 11.0

details

Threads 4 threads
L2 cache 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nms
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C

power consumption

TDP 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 12.45 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
Why on Earth would you compare this CPU to i7? To make it look like a total piece fof garbage? What's wrong with your point system? A10 has 7.5 points, i7 has 8.5, well you start thinking "well, that's not that much of a difference". And then you scroll further and there's this PassMark score different by more than 100 percent. And you think WHOA THIS IS VERY BIG DIFFERENCE AFTER ALL.So guys don't BS your readers, come up with a better point system and start comparing CPUS of the same league so we could get a picture that has some meaning in it.
comments powered by Disqus