AMD A10 5757M 

Released May, 2013
  • 2.5 GHz
  • Quad core
7.2 Out of 10

CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the AMD A10 5757M among laptop CPUs (over 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores
A10 5757M
6.0
Core i5 3337U
6.2
A10 5750M
6.8
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance
A10 5757M
6.4
Core i5 3337U
7.0
A10 5750M
6.7
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics
A10 5757M
7.4
Core i5 3337U
6.2
A10 5750M
7.3
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
A10 5757M
7.7
Core i5 3337U
6.7
A10 5750M
7.5
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
A10 5757M
6.3
Core i5 3337U
10.0
A10 5750M
6.4
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?
A10 5757M
7.5
Core i5 3337U
6.1
A10 5750M
6.5
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more
7.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets
A10 5757M
7.2
Core i5 3337U
7.3
A10 5750M
7.0

Benchmarks Real world tests of the AMD A10 5757M

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

A10 5757M
55.04 mHash/s
Core i5 3337U
11.19 mHash/s
A10 5750M
58.66 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

A10 5757M
0.66 fps
A10 5750M
0.62 fps
Core i5 3337U
0.69 fps

Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark

A10 5757M
2,836
Core i5 3337U
1,653
A10 5750M
2,732

Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark

A10 5757M
3,738
Core i5 3337U
3,371
A10 5750M
3,700

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A10 5757M
3,824
Core i5 3337U
4,478
A10 5750M
4,437

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A10 5757M
1,559
Core i5 3337U
2,166
A10 5750M
1,699

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A10 5757M
1,850,000 MB/s
Core i5 3337U
1,750,000 MB/s
A10 5750M
1,910,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

A10 5757M
3,091
A10 5750M
3,814
Core i5 3337U
3,161

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Clock speed 2.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz
Cores Quad core
Is unlocked No

features

Has a NX bit Yes
Has virtualization support Yes
Instruction set extensions
  1. AES
  2. AMD-V
  3. AMD64
  4. AVX
  5. BMI1
  6. F16C
  7. FMA3
  8. FMA4
  9. MMX
  10. SSE
  11. SSE2
  12. SSE3
  13. SSE4.1
  14. SSE4.2
  15. SSE4a
  16. Supplemental SSE3
  17. TBM
  18. XOP
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 12.79 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W

details

Threads 4 threads
L2 cache 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU
Label Radeon™ HD 8650G
Latest DirectX 11.0
GPU clock speed 600 MHz
Turbo clock speed 720 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in
Memory type DDR3L-1600
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
AMDVSINTEL-Whichwillwin? (08:23 PM, March 14, 2015)
This is all bullshit. The AMD A10 is much faster than the i5 and i7. I use the AMD A10, my wife uses the i7, and my brother in law uses the core i5. Me and my brother in law had a fight against which one is better (were geeks) so we took all 3 laptops and compared. A10 did much better in multicore performance. Was a couple of milliseconds slower in single core. And got about 20 more FPS in BF4. Don't believe me? Here's a link to a similar argument video. www.youtube.com/watch?v=TN9dJ7sewFI
I pick a name (08:06 PM, December 28, 2013)
Why on Earth would you compare this CPU to i7? To make it look like a total piece fof garbage? What's wrong with your point system? A10 has 7.5 points, i7 has 8.5, well you start thinking "well, that's not that much of a difference". And then you scroll further and there's this PassMark score different by more than 100 percent. And you think WHOA THIS IS VERY BIG DIFFERENCE AFTER ALL.So guys don't BS your readers, come up with a better point system and start comparing CPUS of the same league so we could get a picture that has some meaning in it.
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss