AMD A10 5757M 

Released May, 2013
  • 2.5 GHz
  • Quad core

Benchmarks Real world tests of the AMD A10 5757M

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

A10 5757M
55.04 mHash/s
Core i5 3337U
11.19 mHash/s
A10 5750M
58.66 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

A10 5757M
0.66 fps
A10 5750M
0.62 fps
Core i5 3337U
0.69 fps

Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark

A10 5757M
A10 5750M

Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark

A10 5757M
A10 5750M

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A10 5757M
A10 5750M

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A10 5757M
A10 5750M

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A10 5757M
1,850,000 MB/s
Core i5 3337U
1,750,000 MB/s
A10 5750M
1,910,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

A10 5757M
A10 5750M

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Clock speed 2.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz
Cores Quad core
Is unlocked No


Has a NX bit Yes
Has virtualization support Yes
Instruction set extensions
  1. AES
  2. AMD-V
  3. AMD64
  4. AVX
  5. BMI1
  6. F16C
  7. FMA3
  8. FMA4
  9. MMX
  10. SSE
  11. SSE2
  12. SSE3
  13. SSE4.1
  14. SSE4.2
  15. SSE4a
  16. Supplemental SSE3
  17. TBM
  18. XOP
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes

power consumption

Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 12.8 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W


Threads 4 threads
L2 cache 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C


Overclocked clock speed 2.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.5 GHz

integrated graphics

Label Radeon™ HD 8650G
Latest DirectX 11.0
GPU clock speed 600 MHz
Turbo clock speed 720 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in
Memory type DDR3L-1600
Report a correction


Showing 2 comments.
This is all bullshit. The AMD A10 is much faster than the i5 and i7. I use the AMD A10, my wife uses the i7, and my brother in law uses the core i5. Me and my brother in law had a fight against which one is better (were geeks) so we took all 3 laptops and compared. A10 did much better in multicore performance. Was a couple of milliseconds slower in single core. And got about 20 more FPS in BF4. Don't believe me? Here's a link to a similar argument video.
Why on Earth would you compare this CPU to i7? To make it look like a total piece fof garbage? What's wrong with your point system? A10 has 7.5 points, i7 has 8.5, well you start thinking "well, that's not that much of a difference". And then you scroll further and there's this PassMark score different by more than 100 percent. And you think WHOA THIS IS VERY BIG DIFFERENCE AFTER ALL.So guys don't BS your readers, come up with a better point system and start comparing CPUS of the same league so we could get a picture that has some meaning in it.
comments powered by Disqus