AMD A10 5750M 

Released March, 2013
  • 2.5 GHz
  • Quad core
6.7 Out of 10

The graphics portion takes the base clock from 496 MHz up to 533 MHz, while turbo mode improves over the 4600 from 685 MHz to 720 MHz.
by Josh-Walrath (Mar, 2013)
Graphics performance seems to have held flat from Trinity, but an essentially free performance boost on the CPU is welcome.
by Dustin-Sklavos (Jun, 2013)

CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the AMD A10 5750M


Benchmark performance using all cores

A10 5750M
3DMark06 (CPU), PassMark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

A10 5750M
PassMark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

A10 5750M


How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

A10 5750M
Features and specifications that differ between products


CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

A10 5750M

Benchmarks Real world tests of the AMD A10 5750M

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A10 5750M

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A10 5750M

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

A10 5750M

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

A10 5750M

PassMark Data courtesy PassMark

A10 5750M

PassMark (Single Core) Data courtesy PassMark

A10 5750M

In The News From around the web

Lack of competition is showing in a major way: desktop Haswell is a joke, Haswell's GT2 IGP is a minor improvement yet promises to be the most common one in Intel's lineup, and Intel seems to be planning to mostly coast on Haswell for two years while focusing on Atom's successor.
Only the first pass in our x264 benchmark doesn't show a notable jump, but the second pass boasts a remarkable 20% increase in performance.

Richland Unveiled: AMD Releases the New A10-5750M

by Josh Walrath |
As mentioned before, the majority of the gains we see today are the work of low level software optimizations.
AMD claims that these new algorithms can more adequately adjust for corner cases where both units may be bottlenecked, but can correctly decipher which unit actually will show the greatest performance increase by loosening the performance bottleneck.

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Clock speed 2.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz
Cores Quad core
Is unlocked No


Has a NX bit Yes
Has virtualization support Yes
Instruction set extensions
  1. AES
  2. AMD-V
  3. AMD64
  4. AVX
  5. BMI1
  6. F16C
  7. FMA3
  8. FMA4
  9. MMX
  10. SSE
  11. SSE2
  12. SSE3
  13. SSE4.1
  14. SSE4.2
  15. SSE4a
  16. Supplemental SSE3
  17. TBM
  18. XOP
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes

power consumption

Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 11.9 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W


Architecture ARM
Threads 4 threads
L2 cache 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm
Max CPUs 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C


Overclocked clock speed 3.21 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.21 GHz

integrated graphics

Label Radeon™ HD 8650G
Latest DirectX 11.0
GPU clock speed 533 MHz
Turbo clock speed 720 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in
Memory type DDR3-1866
Report a correction


Showing 7 comments.
It's x86_64. Not ARM at all.
ARM architecture? Who is hacking? Please correct it.
Yes I do find it convenient that these sites almost always compare AMD to higher class Intel to show the AMD is inferior. Leads me to believe that they get paid to do such things that only novice computer users would not see. The AMD introduced mobile eyefinity before Intel, they introduced virus save processing before intel, and several other features that intel simply has not had the foresight to develop.
so you can overclock this one less on water than on air ? that`s weird...
Google Intel compiler to find out how rigged these comparisons are.. I had an original athlon 966 from 2000 and still have it although it doesn;t get any use now. I've been given about a half dozen pentium 4s up to 2.2 ghz over the years and the AMD machine was faster than all of them.
I own laptop with this CPU and my geekbench score was about 800 points higher than posted here, and i don't have ssd which probably could make a higher score...
Please stop setting up rigged comparisons like this. An A10 VS an i7???? No. An A10 VS an i3 is much better due to them both being about the same cpu-wise.
comments powered by Disqus