AMD A10 5750M 

Released March, 2013
  • 2.5 GHz
  • Quad core
6.7 Out of 10

The graphics portion takes the base clock from 496 MHz up to 533 MHz, while turbo mode improves over the 4600 from 685 MHz to 720 MHz.
by Josh-Walrath (Mar, 2013)
And anyone who needs more performance than that can simply make the jump to a system with a quad-core Intel CPU that has more muscle.
by Dustin-Sklavos (Jun, 2013)

CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the AMD A10 5750M

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

A10 5750M
6.9
3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

A10 5750M
7.8
Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

A10 5750M
5.3
TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

A10 5750M
4.9
Features and specifications that differ between products

6.7

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

A10 5750M
6.7

Benchmarks Real world tests of the AMD A10 5750M

GeekBench (32-bit)

A10 5750M
3,853

GeekBench

A10 5750M
3,853

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

A10 5750M
2,510

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

A10 5750M
3,243.5

Passmark

A10 5750M
3,814

Passmark (Single Core)

A10 5750M
1,230

In The News From around the web

Lack of competition is showing in a major way: desktop Haswell is a joke, Haswell's GT2 IGP is a minor improvement yet promises to be the most common one in Intel's lineup, and Intel seems to be planning to mostly coast on Haswell for two years while focusing on Atom's successor.
Only the first pass in our x264 benchmark doesn't show a notable jump, but the second pass boasts a remarkable 20% increase in performance.
12
Mar

Richland Unveiled: AMD Releases the New A10-5750M

by Josh Walrath |
www.pcper.com
As mentioned before, the majority of the gains we see today are the work of low level software optimizations.
AMD claims that these new algorithms can more adequately adjust for corner cases where both units may be bottlenecked, but can correctly decipher which unit actually will show the greatest performance increase by loosening the performance bottleneck.

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Clock speed 2.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz
Cores Quad core
Is unlocked No
Is hyperthreaded No

features

Has a NX bit Yes
Has vitualization support Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
  1. MMX
  2. SSE4.2
  3. Supplemental SSE3
  4. SSE4.1
  5. AVX
  6. SSE
  7. SSE4
  8. AES
  9. SSE4a
  10. SSE3
  11. SSE2
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 12.99 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W

details

Threads 4 threads
L2 cache 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nms
Max CPUs 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C

gpu

GPU GPU
Label Radeon™ HD 8650G
Latest DirectX 11.0
GPU clock speed 533 MHz
Turbo clock speed 720 MHz
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
Please stop setting up rigged comparisons like this. An A10 VS an i7???? No. An A10 VS an i3 is much better due to them both being about the same cpu-wise.
comments powered by Disqus