|
| 6.7 Out of 10 |  |
by Josh-Walrath (Mar, 2013)The graphics portion takes the base clock from 496 MHz up to 533 MHz, while turbo mode improves over the 4600 from 685 MHz to 720 MHz.
by Dustin-Sklavos (Jun, 2013)And anyone who needs more performance than that can simply make the jump to a system with a quad-core Intel CPU that has more muscle.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the AMD A10 5750M
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| 3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Power Consumption | |
How much power does the processor require? | |
| TDP | |
Features | |
How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product? | |
| Features and specifications that differ between products | |
| 6.7 | CPUBoss Score |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the AMD A10 5750M
GeekBench (32-bit)
GeekBench (64-bit)
3D Mark 11 (Physics)
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Passmark
Passmark (Single Core)
In The News From around the web
| 28 Jun |
|
Lack of competition is showing in a major way: desktop Haswell is a joke, Haswell's GT2 IGP is a minor improvement yet promises to be the most common one in Intel's lineup, and Intel seems to be planning to mostly coast on Haswell for two years while focusing on Atom's successor.
Only the first pass in our x264 benchmark doesn't show a notable jump, but the second pass boasts a remarkable 20% increase in performance.
| 12 Mar |
|
As mentioned before, the majority of the gains we see today are the work of low level software optimizations.
AMD claims that these new algorithms can more adequately adjust for corner cases where both units may be bottlenecked, but can correctly decipher which unit actually will show the greatest performance increase by loosening the performance bottleneck.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
| Clock speed | 2.5 GHz |
|---|---|
| Turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Cores | Quad core |
| Is unlocked | No |
| Is hyperthreaded | No |
features
| Has a NX bit | Yes |
|---|---|
| Has virtualization support | Yes |
| Instruction set extensions |
|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
power consumption
| TDP | 35W |
|---|---|
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year |
| Performance per watt | 12.23 pt/W |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W |
details
| Architecture | ARM |
|---|---|
| Threads | 4 threads |
| L2 cache | 4 MB |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm |
| Max CPUs | 1 |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C |
overclocking
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.21 GHz |
|---|---|
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.21 GHz |
integrated graphics
| GPU | GPU |
|---|---|
| Label | Radeon™ HD 8650G |
| Latest DirectX | 11.0 |
| GPU clock speed | 533 MHz |
| Turbo clock speed | 720 MHz |
memory controller
| Memory controller | Built-in |
|---|---|
| Memory type | DDR3-1866 |
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $1,448 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $330 | $235 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $330 | $364 | |
| 4790K vs 5820K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $330 | $230 | |
| 4790K vs 4690K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $49 | $161 | |
| 3110M vs N3530 | ||
 | VS | |
| $170 | $230 | |
| 8350 vs 4690K | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 5 comments.
